About The Monkey from Outbreak

Spreading sweetness all over the place. Venmo me or check out my OnlyFans.

How Bombing A People Is Framed As Liberating Them

For privacy reasons YouTube needs your permission to be loaded.

Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), discusses the propaganda infrastructure that has been built over decades to manufacture public consent for the U.S. bombing of Iran. He outlines a coordinated network of Israeli and Saudi-backed media outlets, Washington think tanks (like the Washington Institute for Near East Peace and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies), and AIPAC-aligned lobbying groups that have systematically worked to present war as “liberation”—including running influence operations targeting the Iranian diaspora to create the false impression of broad Iranian support for regime change via military force.

Abdi details how Israeli intelligence was caught running bot farms and troll networks to boost the profile of Reza Pahlavi (the deposed Shah’s son) as a puppet figurehead, and how Iranian-Americans who oppose the war have faced coordinated intimidation, threats, and silencing campaigns.

He also addresses the political dynamics inside the U.S., noting that only around 25% of the American public supports the war, that the Senate’s War Powers vote fell largely along party lines, and that the conflict is already showing signs of destabilization just days in — with CIA-backed ethnic separatists reportedly being armed and reports of covert operations designed to foment civil war rather than achieve any clean military objective. He draws parallels to the Iraq War propaganda playbook while warning that this conflict may unravel faster, and calls on ordinary people and advocacy organizations to pressure lawmakers before the situation becomes irreversible.

Read Abdi’s piece “Inside the Iran War Industry” for The Nation here.

The Four Dem Pigs Who Voted For Slaughter In Iran

Four Democrats split from the rest of their party to vote down the War Powers Resolution which would have halted President Donald Trump from continuing strikes against Iran without first gaining Congressional approval.

Much like it was in the Senate the day before, the measure was defeated in the Republican-led House of Representatives Thursday evening with a 212-219 vote.

With voting largely representing party lines, all but two GOP lawmakers moved against the measure—Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a lead sponsor of the resolution, and Warren Davidson of Ohio.

— Sutherland, Callum. “The Four House Democrats Who Voted against the War Powers Resolution to Rein in Trump on Iran.” TIME, Time, 6 Mar. 2026.

Meta’s Smart Glasses Capture Videos Without Owner Knowledge

The things you record with your AI-powered Meta Ray-Ban glasses — yes, even those intimate moments where you think you’re alone — are probably being seen by strangers.

An investigation by Swedish outlets Svenska Dagbladet and Göteborgs-Posten found that offshore Meta workers in Kenya were asked to analyze intimate and even “disturbing” videos taken by glasses wearers, including videos taken in bathrooms, footage featuring nudity and sexual content, and images showing personal information like bank accounts. It’s part of a process known as data labeling, used to train AI models with footage first reviewed and annotated by humans so that the AI can understand what it’s “looking” at.

Workers told the publication that many of the videos appear to be moments captured when users weren’t aware they were being recorded. The group works under Sama, the same Meta contractor facing a class action lawsuit on behalf of content moderators who allege they have been exploited and forced to review traumatic content without proper working conditions.

— DiBenedetto, Chase. “Meta Workers Forced to Review Intimate Videos Taken by Ray-Ban Smart Glasses.” Mashable, 4 Mar. 2026.

At this point it would probably be safest for people to avoid anything produced by Meta or any audio/video product from Silicon Valley.  They have proven time and time again to be untrustworthy, greedy, exploitive, unconcerned with individual privacy, unconcerned with worker protection, contemptuous of user non-consent, servile to power, and lacking any accountability.  This behavior demands a boycott or regulation.

Go to Top