So Is He A Threat To Democracy Or Isn’t He?
Save this for when a liberal tells you to vote midterm to get Trump out. https://t.co/JMdVoLgAfQ
— 6MileRome (@UnholyRome6) April 28, 2026
Save this for when a liberal tells you to vote midterm to get Trump out. https://t.co/JMdVoLgAfQ
— 6MileRome (@UnholyRome6) April 28, 2026
In January, behind closed doors at the Pentagon, Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby summoned Cardinal Christophe Pierre — Pope Leo XIV’s then-ambassador to the United States — and delivered a lecture.
America, Colby and his colleagues told the cardinal, has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side.
As tempers rose, one U.S. official reached for a fourteenth-century weapon and invoked the Avignon Papacy, the period when the French Crown used military force to bend the bishop of Rome to its will.
That scene, broken this week by Mattia Ferraresi in an extraordinary piece of journalism for The Free Press, may be the most remarkable moment in the long and knotted history of the American republic’s relationship with the Catholic Church.
There is no public record of any Vatican official ever taking a meeting at the Pentagon, and certainly none of a senior U.S. official threatening the Vicar of Christ on Earth with the prospect of an American Babylonian Captivity.
The reporting also confirms — with fresh sources and new color — what I first reported in February: that the Vatican declined the Trump-Vance White House’s invitation to host Pope Leo XIV for America’s 250th anniversary in 2026.
Ferraresi obtained accounts from Vatican and U.S. officials briefed on the Pentagon meeting. According to his sources, Colby’s team picked apart the pope’s January state-of-the-world address line by line and read it as a hostile message aimed directly at the administration.
What enraged them most was Leo’s declaration that “a diplomacy that promotes dialogue and seeks consensus among all parties is being replaced by a diplomacy based on force.”
The Pentagon read that sentence as a frontal challenge to the so-called “Donroe Doctrine” — Trump’s update of Monroe, asserting unchallenged American dominion over the Western Hemisphere.
The cardinal sat through the lecture in silence. The Holy See has not, since that day, given an inch.
— Hale, Christopher. “The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV’s Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy.” Letters from Leo – the American Pope & US Politics, Letters from Leo – the American Pope & US Politics, 8 Apr. 2026.
Let the record reflect that not one former living president denounced Trump’s genocidal pledge to destroy an entire civilization
Like Obama, they’re inconsequential moral cowards who worry in the back of their minds about being held accountable for their own war crimes https://t.co/cC660YBq2S
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) April 8, 2026
Yesterday proved that if a president wanted to, on a whim, he could kill millions of people and Congress wouldn’t even bother to reconvene to stop him.
— Jamie Bonkiewicz (@JamieBonkiewicz) April 8, 2026
As the smoke clears remember this: the so-called “Democrats” in the United States are the lowest form of political life. Every bit as bad as Donald Trump.
— George Galloway (@georgegalloway) April 8, 2026
Where are the human chains in DC?
Where are Democrats leading marches?
Where are the celebrities pretending to care about human rights in award shows?
Where are the intellectuals? The scholars? The veterans? The churches?Where is ANY resistance to this?
Even Nazi Germany had some internal resistance.
This isn’t just Trump.
This is the collective failure of a society.pic.twitter.com/vYVdBxv8PG
— Amir (@AmirAminiMD) April 7, 2026

Where is the opposition to this deranged autocrat? Where is “the resistance”? Who among American leadership is pushing back against this obvious war crime? Where are the fiery condemnations from the Democratic Party against this promised atrocity? Where is the American media? Why have they abandoned even the pretense of moral responsibility to tell the truth about what is happening in this country? How has this failed businessman, this reality-TV personality, cowed an entire generation of politicians, pundits, journalists, businessmen, soldiers, and intellectuals?
Every major institution in the United States seems unwilling or unable to resist. That isn’t just weakness; it’s complicity.
Libs may look down on Hegseth and Trump openly exulting in terrorism and mass murder, but they were complicit in the exact same violence when it was presented to them as humanitarian intervention in Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan. Only the most superficial optics have changed.
— Seth Harp (@sethharpesq) April 7, 2026
True to form, the Democrats immediately signalled their readiness to fund the war, on the assurance that there was a ‘plan’. As Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin put it, ‘we’re in it’. They had no disagreement of principle, having been fully complicit themselves in the Gaza genocide – all they offered was cavilling about process and tactics. And why not? The Democrats had long assimilated Trump’s first-term foreign policy lines regarding China and the Middle East. Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jefferies vied to out-hawk Trump on negotiations with Iran: ‘no side deals’ they insisted. The Democrats voted through Trump’s massive military spending bill; they gave a standing ovation for his sabre-rattling against Iran in the State of the Union address; there was also quiet admiration in the Democratic establishment – openly expressed by Hillary Clinton – for the way he bullied European vassals into bumping up their NATO spending…
A striking datum of this war is how few attempts have been made at selling it, rhetorically dignifying it, morally arming it or situating it in some context of shared Western interests. While the belligerati rehearse exhausted arguments about armed liberation, Pete Hegseth waxes lyrical about ‘death and destruction from the sky all day long’; while they talk de-escalation, Trump demands ‘UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER’; where they seek intelligibility, the administration offers barefaced lies, evasions, contradictions and grandstanding. Of course, since the Gaza genocide, in which Washington spearheaded a global coalition behind a far-right extermination campaign while liberal apologists cultivated a studied obliviousness, the belligerati have refined their capacity for cognitive dissonance. But the situation has moved on. They may once, two decades ago, have been useful to a violently adventurist, rightist administration going to war – but no more. The right no longer caters to, nor needs, its liberal outriders. They hang on out of habit.
— Seymour, Richard. “Cognitive Dissonance.” NLR/Sidecar, New Left Review, 19 Mar. 2026.
Here’s the Chairman of the FCC threatening broadcasters covering the Iran war in ways the administration dislikes with license revocation. They’re clearly not panicking.
Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions – also known as the fake news – have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up.
The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they… https://t.co/7bBgnsbalw
— Brendan Carr (@BrendanCarrFCC) March 14, 2026
NO PANICANS! pic.twitter.com/2Jc8x7ll3C
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 14, 2026
“Don’t panic!” he screamed frantically. Things must be going great over there. Too bad we can’t see for ourselves.