Imperial State Power vs. Moral Sovereignty: The Pentagon Warns The Pope

In January, behind closed doors at the Pentagon, Under Secretary of War for Policy Elbridge Colby summoned Cardinal Christophe Pierre — Pope Leo XIV’s then-ambassador to the United States — and delivered a lecture.

America, Colby and his colleagues told the cardinal, has the military power to do whatever it wants in the world. The Catholic Church had better take its side.

As tempers rose, one U.S. official reached for a fourteenth-century weapon and invoked the Avignon Papacy, the period when the French Crown used military force to bend the bishop of Rome to its will.

That scene, broken this week by Mattia Ferraresi in an extraordinary piece of journalism for The Free Press, may be the most remarkable moment in the long and knotted history of the American republic’s relationship with the Catholic Church.

There is no public record of any Vatican official ever taking a meeting at the Pentagon, and certainly none of a senior U.S. official threatening the Vicar of Christ on Earth with the prospect of an American Babylonian Captivity.

The reporting also confirms — with fresh sources and new color — what I first reported in February: that the Vatican declined the Trump-Vance White House’s invitation to host Pope Leo XIV for America’s 250th anniversary in 2026.

Ferraresi obtained accounts from Vatican and U.S. officials briefed on the Pentagon meeting. According to his sources, Colby’s team picked apart the pope’s January state-of-the-world address line by line and read it as a hostile message aimed directly at the administration.

What enraged them most was Leo’s declaration that “a diplomacy that promotes dialogue and seeks consensus among all parties is being replaced by a diplomacy based on force.”

The Pentagon read that sentence as a frontal challenge to the so-called “Donroe Doctrine” — Trump’s update of Monroe, asserting unchallenged American dominion over the Western Hemisphere.

The cardinal sat through the lecture in silence. The Holy See has not, since that day, given an inch.

— Hale, Christopher. “The Pentagon Threatened Pope Leo XIV’s Ambassador with the Avignon Papacy.” Letters from Leo – the American Pope & US Politics, Letters from Leo – the American Pope & US Politics, 8 Apr. 2026.

The United States possesses overwhelming force, intends to use it to define order, and expects major institutions, including the Church, to stop obstructing that project and align themselves with it. The Pentagon’s invocation of the Avignon Papacy signals a theory of politics: that spiritual authority bends when temporal power is sufficiently hard and sufficiently ruthless. A clear telegraph of intimidation from an American military institution to an American Pope.

Genocide Was In The Offing; Dems Said Little and Did Nothing

Gaza Was The Rubicon of US Society’s Moral Degeneracy. Everything After is Noise.

American Psycho

Where is the opposition to this deranged autocrat? Where is “the resistance”? Who among American leadership is pushing back against this obvious war crime? Where are the fiery condemnations from the Democratic Party against this promised atrocity? Where is the American media? Why have they abandoned even the pretense of moral responsibility to tell the truth about what is happening in this country? How has this failed businessman, this reality-TV personality, cowed an entire generation of politicians, pundits, journalists, businessmen, soldiers, and intellectuals?

Every major institution in the United States seems unwilling or unable to resist. That isn’t just weakness; it’s complicity.

2026-04-07T15:09:32+00:00Categories: Depravity, War|Tags: , , , , |

Shajareh Tayyebeh School, 28 February 2026

Gaza and Iran Affirm Dems Are Only Controlled Opposition

True to form, the Democrats immediately signalled their readiness to fund the war, on the assurance that there was a ‘plan’. As Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin put it, ‘we’re in it’. They had no disagreement of principle, having been fully complicit themselves in the Gaza genocide – all they offered was cavilling about process and tactics. And why not? The Democrats had long assimilated Trump’s first-term foreign policy lines regarding China and the Middle East. Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jefferies vied to out-hawk Trump on negotiations with Iran: ‘no side deals’ they insisted. The Democrats voted through Trump’s massive military spending bill; they gave a standing ovation for his sabre-rattling against Iran in the State of the Union address; there was also quiet admiration in the Democratic establishment – openly expressed by Hillary Clinton – for the way he bullied European vassals into bumping up their NATO spending…

A striking datum of this war is how few attempts have been made at selling it, rhetorically dignifying it, morally arming it or situating it in some context of shared Western interests. While the belligerati rehearse exhausted arguments about armed liberation, Pete Hegseth waxes lyrical about ‘death and destruction from the sky all day long’; while they talk de-escalation, Trump demands ‘UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER’; where they seek intelligibility, the administration offers barefaced lies, evasions, contradictions and grandstanding. Of course, since the Gaza genocide, in which Washington spearheaded a global coalition behind a far-right extermination campaign while liberal apologists cultivated a studied obliviousness, the belligerati have refined their capacity for cognitive dissonance. But the situation has moved on. They may once, two decades ago, have been useful to a violently adventurist, rightist administration going to war – but no more. The right no longer caters to, nor needs, its liberal outriders. They hang on out of habit.

— Seymour, Richard. “Cognitive Dissonance.” NLR/Sidecar, New Left Review, 19 Mar. 2026.

FCC Chair Threatens News Outlets Covering Iran War

Here’s the Chairman of the FCC threatening broadcasters covering the Iran war in ways the administration dislikes with license revocation. They’re clearly not panicking.

How Bombing A People Is Framed As Liberating Them

For privacy reasons YouTube needs your permission to be loaded.

Jamal Abdi, president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), discusses the propaganda infrastructure that has been built over decades to manufacture public consent for the U.S. bombing of Iran. He outlines a coordinated network of Israeli and Saudi-backed media outlets, Washington think tanks (like the Washington Institute for Near East Peace and the Foundation for Defense of Democracies), and AIPAC-aligned lobbying groups that have systematically worked to present war as “liberation”—including running influence operations targeting the Iranian diaspora to create the false impression of broad Iranian support for regime change via military force.

Abdi details how Israeli intelligence was caught running bot farms and troll networks to boost the profile of Reza Pahlavi (the deposed Shah’s son) as a puppet figurehead, and how Iranian-Americans who oppose the war have faced coordinated intimidation, threats, and silencing campaigns.

He also addresses the political dynamics inside the U.S., noting that only around 25% of the American public supports the war, that the Senate’s War Powers vote fell largely along party lines, and that the conflict is already showing signs of destabilization just days in — with CIA-backed ethnic separatists reportedly being armed and reports of covert operations designed to foment civil war rather than achieve any clean military objective. He draws parallels to the Iraq War propaganda playbook while warning that this conflict may unravel faster, and calls on ordinary people and advocacy organizations to pressure lawmakers before the situation becomes irreversible.

Read Abdi’s piece “Inside the Iran War Industry” for The Nation here.

Go to Top